[PATCH] D96371: [lit] Add --ignore-fail
James Henderson via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Feb 12 02:04:01 PST 2021
jhenderson added a comment.
In D96371#2556413 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D96371#2556413>, @thopre wrote:
> I'm still not sure, I think a failure is a powerful motivator to fix something but patch LGTM otherwise. @jhenderson what do you think?
Sorry, I'm a little bit busy with other reviews, so haven't had a chance to dig into this properly yet.
If I follow what you're saying correctly, rather than check-all executing lit in a single run across multiple directories, in some cases, it is spawning a new lit process to run some test subset. Is that right? If so, I wonder if there's a better solution of getting check-all to actually run all the tests as one big test.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D96371/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D96371
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list