[PATCH] D96482: [DeveloperPolicy] Specify LLVM's license more clearly.

[Kristof Beyls via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

kristof.beyls added a comment.

In D96482#2556315 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D96482#2556315>, @tschuett wrote:

> If you would extend the paragraph, you could say:
> "For reference the SPDX identifier is ..."

Yes, it could be helpful to also explicitly call out the SPDX identifier. However, there is also value in keeping that introductory paragraph as short as possible.
On balance, I think it's slightly better to not call out the SPDX identifier in that introductory paragraph.
Maybe there's value in explicitly calling out the SPDX identifiers in one of the later paragraphs?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D96482/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D96482