[PATCH] D96101: [opt][NewPM] Add a --print-passes flag to print all available passes

[Arthur Eubanks via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

aeubanks added inline comments.


================
Comment at: llvm/test/Other/print-passes.ll:6
+; CHECK: Module analyses:
+; CHECK: no-op-module
+; CHECK: Module alias analyses:
----------------
bjope wrote:
> Should analysis passes perhaps be printed as require<name>?
Technically `require<foo>` is a pass that just runs `foo`, so that's separate. I added in the `--help` for `-passes` that you can specify `require<foo>`.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D96101/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D96101