[PATCH] D95959: [ValueTracking] improve analysis for "C << X" and "C >> X"

Simon Pilgrim via Phabricator via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Feb 8 13:29:57 PST 2021

Previous message: [PATCH] D95959: [ValueTracking] improve analysis for "C << X" and "C >> X"
Next message: [PATCH] D95959: [ValueTracking] improve analysis for "C << X" and "C >> X"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RKSimon accepted this revision.
RKSimon added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.

LGTM


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D95959/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D95959

Previous message: [PATCH] D95959: [ValueTracking] improve analysis for "C << X" and "C >> X"
Next message: [PATCH] D95959: [ValueTracking] improve analysis for "C << X" and "C >> X"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the llvm-commits mailing list