[PATCH] D96212: [Verifier] Allow DW_TAG_class_type/DW_TAG_union_type to have no filename

[Adrian Prantl via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

aprantl added a comment.

I suppose there is no good reason to require a file name. In other places we work around this by creating a file with the name `"<compiler-generated>"` but this doesn't add  a lot of information. Do the various backends in AsmPrinter (DWARF+CodeView) accept null Files on these nodes?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D96212/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D96212