[PATCH] D93298: [RISCV] add the MC layer support of Zfinx extension

[Alex Bradbury via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

asb added a comment.

I started reviewing this alongside the specification in https://github.com/riscv/riscv-zfinx/blob/master/Zfinx_spec.adoc. At the time of writing, it seems to define "zfinx" but not "zfhinx" and "zfdinx" as seem to be used in this patch. I think intent is that rv32ifd_zfinx is the equivalent of "zfdinx" in this patch. Is there a reason to go for different naming, or a different version of the spec I should be looking at?


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D93298/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D93298