[PATCH] D90948: [WebAssembly] call_indirect issues table number relocs

[Sam Clegg via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

sbc100 added a comment.

I'm beginning to (re-)wonder if we should leave the current "call_indirect" as special in that it always implicitly refers the magic table zero..  then we would introduce a new instruction for `call_indirect_explict` that could be used if and only if reference types is enabled and would have the relocation.   Data and function addresses will always be special in llvm so I think its OK to reflect that if it makes things simpler.   I guess it would make things simpler in some ways and more complex in other?   (Sorry if I'm re-litigating prior decisions here).


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D90948/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D90948