[PATCH] D93129: [LV] Do not use vector type to compute cost of scalar address comp.

[Pengfei Wang via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

pengfei added a comment.

I don't have much experience on performance tuning. Adding more people who contributed to the affected tests.

> I checked on both ARM64 and X86 (skylake), and the vectorized versions are roughly 2x faster than the scalar loops.

How did you check the performance? Can we evaluate the affected tests `inv_val_store_to_inv_address_conditional` and `masked_strided2` using the same method?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D93129/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D93129