[PATCH] D94993: [lld][WebAssembly] Don't defined indirect function table in relocatable output
Sam Clegg via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jan 19 12:57:53 PST 2021
sbc100 added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lld/test/wasm/locals-duplicate.test:241
+; RELOC-NEXT: Index: 0
+; RELOC-NEXT: ElemType: FUNCREF
+; RELOC-NEXT: Limits:
----------------
dschuff wrote:
> dschuff wrote:
> > is this elemtype correct? do we just not distinguish right now?
> Looks like the answer is that we only have FUNCREF and EXTERNREF right now. Maybe doesn't matter for this case, I guess that's something we can fix in the future.
This is correct I think yes. This is the only possible elem type today I think. What else would you expect it to say here?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D94993/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D94993
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list