[PATCH] D82862: [ThinLTO] Always parse module level inline asm with At&t dialect

Hans Wennborg via Phabricator via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Jan 15 04:33:04 PST 2021


hans added a subscriber: rnk.
hans added a comment.

> In D82862#2498785 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D82862#2498785>, @hans wrote:
>
>> The motivation for my change was really just to make ThinLTO compiles work the same as non-ThinLTO ones.
>>
>> Maybe the fact that -x86-asm-syntax=intel doesn't affect inline asm is a bug. I wasn't aware that Clang and GCC's -masm= flags behaved differently in that way, but that certainly suggests there's a problem here.
>
> So I'm wondering, if I remove the above setAssemblerDialect line **and** revert this commit, we should have inline asm (both module-level and GNU function-leve) respect the target-selected asm dialect variant both for ThinLTO and non-ThinLTO, so they should match again.   Would that also solve the problem you were originally tracking?

Not completely, because clang-cl sets -x86-asm-syntax=intel to enable intel-style asm in assembly listing output. We'd have to find another way of doing that without affecting the inline asm dialect.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D82862/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D82862



More information about the llvm-commits mailing list