[PATCH] D94002: [LangRef] Make lifetime intrinsic's semantics consistent with StackColoring's comment
Juneyoung Lee via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jan 7 21:24:42 PST 2021
aqjune added a comment.
Thinking about @jdoerfert 's suggestion again, it still implies that objects may have overlapping addresses regardless of lifetime. Am I understanding correctly?
What about this model I just updated? Would this support interested optimizations for lifetimes with non-allocas?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D94002/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D94002
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list