[PATCH] D93511: [Sink] Process basic blocks with a single successor
Matt Arsenault via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Dec 23 11:48:22 PST 2020
arsenm added inline comments.
================
Comment at: llvm/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/andorbitset.ll:55
+; SI: v_cmp_ge_f32_e64
define void @bitset_verifier_error() local_unnamed_addr #0 {
bb:
----------------
MaskRay wrote:
> arsenm wrote:
> > I think this was also to trick the dag, probably should add a conditional branch
> The original test did not make it clear what `s_bitset0_b32` tried to check, so I arbitrarily replaced it with another instruction in the entry basic block.
>
> I don't know AMDGPU ISA and will need help to update this test and the test below:/
I think the point of the test is the bitset needs to be there, so this is no longer checking the right thing
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D93511/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D93511
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list