[PATCH] D93054: [ARM] Add bank conflict hazarding
David Penry via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Dec 18 15:42:18 PST 2020
dpenry marked 2 inline comments as done.
dpenry added inline comments.
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMHazardRecognizer.cpp:225
+ BasePseudoVal0->kind() == BasePseudoVal1->kind() &&
+ BasePseudoVal0->isConstantPool() && AssumeITCMBankConflict)
+ return Hazard;
----------------
SjoerdMeijer wrote:
> Option `AssumeITCMBankConflict` defaults to false. Do have/need a test with this enabled?
For Cortex-M7, this flag is enabled. There isn't a test written to distinguish between enabled/disabled at present.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D93054/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D93054
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list