[PATCH] D84113: [Debuginfo] (1/7) [DW_OP_implicit_pointer/second strategy] Support for DW_OP_LLVM_implicit_pointer

[Adrian Prantl via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

aprantl accepted this revision.
aprantl added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.

> This is needed because representation and specification (types of operands) of

it a bit different than actual dwarf expression DW_OP_implicit_pointer.

Can you add this to the documention to explain what/how this is different from the DWARF op?

Otherwise this LGTM


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D84113/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D84113