[PATCH] D92775: [clang][cli] Add flexible TableGen multiclass for boolean options

[Duncan P. N. Exon Smith via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

dexonsmith added a comment.

> Not 100% sure the benefits are worth the added complexity.

I think this is worth it. Names seem pretty clear to me. All around, this seems a lot more clear to me than the approach you had in the CodeGenOptions patch.



================
Comment at: clang/unittests/Frontend/CompilerInvocationTest.cpp:226
   ASSERT_THAT(GeneratedArgs,
-              Contains(StrEq("-fno-experimental-new-pass-manager")));
+              Not(Contains(StrEq("-fno-experimental-new-pass-manager"))));
   ASSERT_THAT(GeneratedArgs,
----------------
Can you clarify why this was dropped? Was it previously emitted due to a limitation in the implementation, or are we no longer supporting options that always get emitted for clarity?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D92775/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D92775