[PATCH] D91560: [flang] Duplicate names for ac-implied-do variables erroneously cause errors

Mon Nov 16 14:14:05 PST 2020

PeteSteinfeld added inline comments.

================
Comment at: flang/test/Evaluate/folding15.f90:7
+  integer :: dups(21) = &
+    [ ((iDuplicate, iDuplicate = 1,j), &
+       (2 * iDuplicate, iDuplicate = j,3 ), &
----------------
klausler wrote:
> Can you test using the "outer" iDuplicate as part of an implied DO loop bound expression for the "inner" iDuplicate, please?
I'm not sure what you mean.  In the two tests I added, the "iDuplicate" variables are defined in parallel scopes.  It's not allowed to have an ac-implied-do variable with the same name as one in an outer scope.

Can you give me an example?

Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D91560/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D91560