[PATCH] D90591: [ARM] Introduce t2DoLoopStartTP

[Sam Parker via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

samparker added a comment.

> That's all about different patches though! Any comments on this one?

Sorry, it's just difficult to gauge this without a view on the wider implementation idea. For the other stuff that you're talking about, of course we need //that// in MI but, like I said at the start, we could currently achieve this patch with probably 10x less code at the IR level.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D90591/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D90591