[PATCH] D90610: [Inline] Fix in handling of ptrtoint in InlineCost
Mikael Holmén via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Nov 2 07:19:24 PST 2020
uabelho added inline comments.
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Analysis/InlineCost.cpp:1104
unsigned AS = I.getOperand(0)->getType()->getPointerAddressSpace();
if (IntegerSize >= DL.getPointerSizeInBits(AS)) {
std::pair<Value *, APInt> BaseAndOffset =
----------------
I suppose the simplest fix would just be to change the >= to == here, so we only save stuff in ConstantOffsetPtrs when the sizes match exactly?
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Analysis/InlineCost.cpp:1124
+ else {
+ APInt OffsetWithCorrectSize = BaseAndOffset.second.sext(IntegerSize);
+ std::pair<Value *, APInt> BaseAndOffsetWithCorrectSize =
----------------
I don't know if sext is what we want to do here, of it that may lead to problems?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D90610/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D90610
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list