[PATCH] D66324: clang-misexpect: Profile Guided Validation of Performance Annotations in LLVM

[Roman Lebedev via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

lebedev.ri added a comment.

In D66324#2336186 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D66324#2336186>, @phosek wrote:

> I apologize for the late response, I somehow missed the earlier responses. We have successfully used this feature in Fuchsia and found it useful, but I agree that the issues raised need to be addressed. Unfortunately @paulkirth is no longer working on this project. I hope that someone from our team can take a look but it might take a few weeks. If you prefer, we could revert this change and then reland an improved version in the future?

I would very much prefer *NOT* not revert if someone is going to step up to work on these problems soon (within next 4 weeks?).

That being said, in light of that bug, my original doubts about the underlying data type (a novel `MD_misexpect`,
with structure different from `MD_prof`) have reappeared with double strength. I really think they should share underlying type.


Repository:
  rL LLVM

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D66324/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D66324