[llvm] f192a27 - Sink: Handle instruction sink when a user is dead
Changpeng Fang via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Oct 9 16:21:09 PDT 2020
Author: Changpeng Fang
Date: 2020-10-09T16:20:26-07:00
New Revision: f192a27ed3bacdf727f27857adeb6d3762383295
URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f192a27ed3bacdf727f27857adeb6d3762383295
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f192a27ed3bacdf727f27857adeb6d3762383295.diff
LOG: Sink: Handle instruction sink when a user is dead
Summary:
The current instruction sink pass uses findNearestCommonDominator of all users to find block to sink the instruction to.
However, a user may be in a dead block, which will result in unexpected behavior.
This patch handles such cases by skipping dead blocks. This patch fixes:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47415
Reviewers:
MaskRay, arsenm
Differential Revision:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D89166
Added:
llvm/test/Transforms/Sink/dead-user.ll
Modified:
llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/Sink.cpp
Removed:
################################################################################
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/Sink.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/Sink.cpp
index c430724ab1ac..89cfbe384be4 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/Sink.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/Sink.cpp
@@ -135,6 +135,9 @@ static bool SinkInstruction(Instruction *Inst,
for (Use &U : Inst->uses()) {
Instruction *UseInst = cast<Instruction>(U.getUser());
BasicBlock *UseBlock = UseInst->getParent();
+ // Don't worry about dead users.
+ if (!DT.isReachableFromEntry(UseBlock))
+ continue;
if (PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(UseInst)) {
// PHI nodes use the operand in the predecessor block, not the block with
// the PHI.
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/Sink/dead-user.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/Sink/dead-user.ll
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..2d21defbb42a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/Sink/dead-user.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+; Compiler should not be broken with a dead user.
+; RUN: opt -sink -S < %s | FileCheck %s
+
+; CHECK-LABEL: @test(
+; CHECK: bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT: %conv = sext i16 %p1 to i32
+; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 undef, label %bb.1, label %bb.3
+
+; CHECK: bb.1: ; preds = %bb.0
+; CHECK-NEXT: br label %bb.2
+
+; CHECK: bb.2: ; preds = %bb.2, %bb.1
+; CHECK-NEXT: %and.2 = and i32 undef, %conv
+; CHECK-NEXT: br label %bb.2
+
+; CHECK: bb.3: ; preds = %bb.3, %bb.0
+; CHECK-NEXT: %and.3 = and i32 undef, %conv
+; CHECK-NEXT: br label %bb.3
+
+; CHECK: dead: ; preds = %dead
+; CHECK-NEXT: %and.dead = and i32 undef, %conv
+; CHECK-NEXT: br label %dead
+define void @test(i16 %p1) {
+bb.0:
+ %conv = sext i16 %p1 to i32
+ br i1 undef, label %bb.1, label %bb.3
+
+bb.1: ; preds = %bb.0
+ br label %bb.2
+
+bb.2: ; preds = %bb.2, %bb.1
+ %and.2 = and i32 undef, %conv
+ br label %bb.2
+
+bb.3: ; preds = %bb.3, %bb.0
+ %and.3 = and i32 undef, %conv
+ br label %bb.3
+
+dead: ; preds = %dead
+ %and.dead = and i32 undef, %conv
+ br label %dead
+}
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list