[PATCH] D88783: [InstCombine] matchFunnelShift - fold or(shl(a,x),lshr(b,sub(bw,x))) -> fshl(a,b,x) iff x < bw
Roman Lebedev via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Oct 9 04:12:53 PDT 2020
- Previous message: [PATCH] D88783: [InstCombine] matchFunnelShift - fold or(shl(a,x),lshr(b,sub(bw,x))) -> fshl(a,b,x) iff x < bw
- Next message: [PATCH] D88783: [InstCombine] matchFunnelShift - fold or(shl(a,x),lshr(b,sub(bw,x))) -> fshl(a,b,x) iff x < bw
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
lebedev.ri added a comment.
In D88783#2321414 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D88783#2321414>, @RKSimon wrote:
> Just so I don't unnecessarily waste time on this - are your main/blocking concerns that backend legalization/lowering is still poor or is it more fundamental than that?
I'm mainly interested in a better spelled-out motivation for the knownbits restriction.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D88783/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D88783
- Previous message: [PATCH] D88783: [InstCombine] matchFunnelShift - fold or(shl(a,x),lshr(b,sub(bw,x))) -> fshl(a,b,x) iff x < bw
- Next message: [PATCH] D88783: [InstCombine] matchFunnelShift - fold or(shl(a,x),lshr(b,sub(bw,x))) -> fshl(a,b,x) iff x < bw
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list