[PATCH] D88628: [flang][openacc] Fix semantic check for wait, cache and atomic directives

[Valentin Clement via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

clementval added inline comments.


================
Comment at: flang/test/Semantics/acc-clause-validity.f90:448
+
+  !$acc cache(i, j)
+  !$acc cache(readonly: i, j)
----------------
kiranchandramohan wrote:
> should this be an array element or subarray?
Yes. Will update the test. Anyway I'll need to add a check to enforce that in a follow-up patch. 


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D88628/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D88628