[PATCH] D86147: [LangRef] Revise semantics of get.active.lane.mask

[Sam Parker via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

samparker added a comment.

But if you're going to expand it like that, then why not just state those semantics in the language ref..? I think the description is rather verbose and a bit confusing, and I'm already quite familiar with what it's supposed to do! By just using %n, you should be able to skip the references to BTC and make it 2x easier to understand.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D86147/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D86147