[PATCH] D84589: [CodeMoverUtils] Add optional data dependence checks using Alias Analysis
Whitney Tsang via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sat Jul 25 12:44:08 PDT 2020
Whitney added inline comments.
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/CodeMoverUtils.cpp:230
+bool isDependenceSafe(Instruction &I, DependenceInfo &DI,
+ SmallPtrSet<Instruction *, 10> InstsToCheck) {
----------------
Please add a description for each `isDependenceSafe()`. And declare them as `static`.
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/CodeMoverUtils.cpp:231
+bool isDependenceSafe(Instruction &I, DependenceInfo &DI,
+ SmallPtrSet<Instruction *, 10> InstsToCheck) {
+ return llvm::none_of(InstsToCheck, [&DI, &I](Instruction *CurInst) {
----------------
`SmallPtrSet<Instruction *, 10>` -> `SmallPtrSetImpl<Instruction *>`
Same for the other `isDependenceSafe()`.
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/CodeMoverUtils.cpp:258
+
+ if (!AA.isNoAlias(MemLoc, DestMemLoc))
+ return true;
----------------
check this at line 251.
```
if (AA.isNoAlias(MemLoc, DestMemLoc))
return false;
```
================
Comment at: llvm/unittests/Transforms/Utils/CodeMoverUtilsTest.cpp:46
+ AAResults AA(TLI);
+ DataLayout DL("e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128");
+ BasicAAResult BAA(DL, *F, TLI, AC, &DT);
----------------
Does `DataLayout DL("");` work?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D84589/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D84589
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list