[PATCH] D83423: [MC, NVPTX] Add MCAsmPrinter support for unsigned-only data directives.
Hal Finkel via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jul 13 19:29:19 PDT 2020
hfinkel added inline comments.
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/MC/MCExpr.cpp:69
+ else if (MAI && !MAI->supportsSignedData())
+ OS << static_cast<uint64_t>(Value);
else
----------------
tra wrote:
> hfinkel wrote:
> > Will uint64_t always be correct here? Shouldn't this depend on SizeInBytes (like the hex printing does)?
> MCConstantExpr::getValue() returns int64_t so casting it to uint64_t should be safe.
>
> I guess I can find the matching unsigned type using std::make_unsigned. E.g:
> ```
> using unsigned_t = typename std::make_unsigned<decltype(Value)>::type;
> OS << static_cast<unsigned_t>(v);
> ```
I'm not worried about the cast being unsafe, at the C++ level, I'm worried about it printing a number larger than the relevant directive actually accepts. In your test, the directive is .b64, which presumably takes a 64-bit integer, so everything's fine. What if it were .b8 and the printed argument were 18446744073709551613 (or whatever)?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D83423/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D83423
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list