[llvm] 683a7f7 - [DAGCombiner] fix function-name formatting; NFC
Sanjay Patel via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jul 8 09:50:19 PDT 2020
Author: Sanjay Patel
Date: 2020-07-08T12:49:59-04:00
New Revision: 683a7f7025b3115053449a76463e11916ecf350f
URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/683a7f7025b3115053449a76463e11916ecf350f
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/683a7f7025b3115053449a76463e11916ecf350f.diff
LOG: [DAGCombiner] fix function-name formatting; NFC
Added:
Modified:
llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp
Removed:
################################################################################
diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp
index d12cf74e5cd7..27b340ffcb7e 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp
@@ -678,34 +678,31 @@ namespace {
/// can be combined into narrow loads.
bool BackwardsPropagateMask(SDNode *N);
- /// Helper function for MergeConsecutiveStores which merges the
- /// component store chains.
+ /// Helper function for mergeConsecutiveStores which merges the component
+ /// store chains.
SDValue getMergeStoreChains(SmallVectorImpl<MemOpLink> &StoreNodes,
unsigned NumStores);
- /// This is a helper function for MergeConsecutiveStores. When the
- /// source elements of the consecutive stores are all constants or
- /// all extracted vector elements, try to merge them into one
- /// larger store introducing bitcasts if necessary. \return True
- /// if a merged store was created.
- bool MergeStoresOfConstantsOrVecElts(SmallVectorImpl<MemOpLink> &StoreNodes,
+ /// This is a helper function for mergeConsecutiveStores. When the source
+ /// elements of the consecutive stores are all constants or all extracted
+ /// vector elements, try to merge them into one larger store introducing
+ /// bitcasts if necessary. \return True if a merged store was created.
+ bool mergeStoresOfConstantsOrVecElts(SmallVectorImpl<MemOpLink> &StoreNodes,
EVT MemVT, unsigned NumStores,
bool IsConstantSrc, bool UseVector,
bool UseTrunc);
- /// This is a helper function for MergeConsecutiveStores. Stores
- /// that potentially may be merged with St are placed in
- /// StoreNodes. RootNode is a chain predecessor to all store
- /// candidates.
+ /// This is a helper function for mergeConsecutiveStores. Stores that
+ /// potentially may be merged with St are placed in StoreNodes. RootNode is
+ /// a chain predecessor to all store candidates.
void getStoreMergeCandidates(StoreSDNode *St,
SmallVectorImpl<MemOpLink> &StoreNodes,
SDNode *&Root);
- /// Helper function for MergeConsecutiveStores. Checks if
- /// candidate stores have indirect dependency through their
- /// operands. RootNode is the predecessor to all stores calculated
- /// by getStoreMergeCandidates and is used to prune the dependency check.
- /// \return True if safe to merge.
+ /// Helper function for mergeConsecutiveStores. Checks if candidate stores
+ /// have indirect dependency through their operands. RootNode is the
+ /// predecessor to all stores calculated by getStoreMergeCandidates and is
+ /// used to prune the dependency check. \return True if safe to merge.
bool checkMergeStoreCandidatesForDependencies(
SmallVectorImpl<MemOpLink> &StoreNodes, unsigned NumStores,
SDNode *RootNode);
@@ -714,7 +711,7 @@ namespace {
/// This optimization uses wide integers or vectors when possible.
/// \return number of stores that were merged into a merged store (the
/// affected nodes are stored as a prefix in \p StoreNodes).
- bool MergeConsecutiveStores(StoreSDNode *St);
+ bool mergeConsecutiveStores(StoreSDNode *St);
/// Try to transform a truncation where C is a constant:
/// (trunc (and X, C)) -> (and (trunc X), (trunc C))
@@ -15863,7 +15860,7 @@ SDValue DAGCombiner::getMergeStoreChains(SmallVectorImpl<MemOpLink> &StoreNodes,
return DAG.getTokenFactor(StoreDL, Chains);
}
-bool DAGCombiner::MergeStoresOfConstantsOrVecElts(
+bool DAGCombiner::mergeStoresOfConstantsOrVecElts(
SmallVectorImpl<MemOpLink> &StoreNodes, EVT MemVT, unsigned NumStores,
bool IsConstantSrc, bool UseVector, bool UseTrunc) {
// Make sure we have something to merge.
@@ -16241,7 +16238,7 @@ bool DAGCombiner::checkMergeStoreCandidatesForDependencies(
return true;
}
-bool DAGCombiner::MergeConsecutiveStores(StoreSDNode *St) {
+bool DAGCombiner::mergeConsecutiveStores(StoreSDNode *St) {
if (OptLevel == CodeGenOpt::None || !EnableStoreMerging)
return false;
@@ -16449,7 +16446,7 @@ bool DAGCombiner::MergeConsecutiveStores(StoreSDNode *St) {
continue;
}
- RV |= MergeStoresOfConstantsOrVecElts(StoreNodes, MemVT, NumElem, true,
+ RV |= mergeStoresOfConstantsOrVecElts(StoreNodes, MemVT, NumElem, true,
UseVector, LastIntegerTrunc);
// Remove merged stores for next iteration.
@@ -16516,7 +16513,7 @@ bool DAGCombiner::MergeConsecutiveStores(StoreSDNode *St) {
continue;
}
- RV |= MergeStoresOfConstantsOrVecElts(
+ RV |= mergeStoresOfConstantsOrVecElts(
StoreNodes, MemVT, NumStoresToMerge, false, true, false);
StoreNodes.erase(StoreNodes.begin(),
@@ -17046,7 +17043,7 @@ SDValue DAGCombiner::visitSTORE(SDNode *N) {
// There can be multiple store sequences on the same chain.
// Keep trying to merge store sequences until we are unable to do so
// or until we merge the last store on the chain.
- bool Changed = MergeConsecutiveStores(ST);
+ bool Changed = mergeConsecutiveStores(ST);
if (!Changed) break;
// Return N as merge only uses CombineTo and no worklist clean
// up is necessary.
@@ -21890,10 +21887,10 @@ bool operator!=(const UnitT &, const UnitT &) { return false; }
// redundant, as this function gets called when visiting every store
// node, so why not let the work be done on each store as it's visited?
//
-// I believe this is mainly important because MergeConsecutiveStores
+// I believe this is mainly important because mergeConsecutiveStores
// is unable to deal with merging stores of
diff erent sizes, so unless
// we improve the chains of all the potential candidates up-front
-// before running MergeConsecutiveStores, it might only see some of
+// before running mergeConsecutiveStores, it might only see some of
// the nodes that will eventually be candidates, and then not be able
// to go from a partially-merged state to the desired final
// fully-merged state.
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list