[PATCH] D81646: MIR Statepoint refactoring. Part 2: Operand folding.

[Philip Reames via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

reames added a comment.

I can't wrap my head around why untieing operands would be correct here.  It seems like we could end up with a use folded, but a def not leaving to invalid codegen?  Can you either expand on the justification or discuss offline?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D81646/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D81646