[PATCH] D81311: [RFC] LangRef: Define inmem parameter attribute

[John McCall via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

rjmccall added a comment.

In D81311#2083295 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D81311#2083295>, @arsenm wrote:

> In D81311#2078235 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D81311#2078235>, @rjmccall wrote:
>
> > I wonder if `byref` would be a better name for this, as a way to say that the object is semantically a direct argument that's being passed by implicit reference.
>
>
> This is probably a better name, but potentially more easily confused with byval.


That seems like an unlikely confusion.

> As far as switching to just the raw number, I think there's value in being consistent with the other growing family of type-carrying parameter attributes but I don't really care about the type itself. I don't understand inalloca/preallocated well enough to know if those should also really only carry a size.

I think carrying a type is probably an attempt to insulate them against the future removal of pointer element types.  I don't think it's actually necessary in either case and could certainly just be a size and alignment.  But if you want to use a type, I agree it's not inconsistent, and as long as you honor an explicit alignment it's fine.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D81311/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D81311