[llvm] 66a1b83 - [TargetLowering][NFC] More efficient emitPatchpoint().
Denis Antrushin via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Jun 5 04:57:46 PDT 2020
Author: Denis Antrushin
Date: 2020-06-05T14:57:29+03:00
New Revision: 66a1b83bf93ec46f6d7a06c47d5981ae154f9ea0
URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/66a1b83bf93ec46f6d7a06c47d5981ae154f9ea0
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/66a1b83bf93ec46f6d7a06c47d5981ae154f9ea0.diff
LOG: [TargetLowering][NFC] More efficient emitPatchpoint().
Current implementation of emitPatchpoint() is very inefficient:
for every FrameIndex operand if creates new MachineInstr with
that operand expanded and all other copied as is.
Since PATCHPOINT/STATEPOINT instructions may have *a lot* of
FrameIndex operands, we end up creating and erasing many
machine instructions. But we can do it in single pass, with only
one new machine instruction generated.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81181
Added:
Modified:
llvm/lib/CodeGen/TargetLoweringBase.cpp
Removed:
################################################################################
diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/TargetLoweringBase.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/TargetLoweringBase.cpp
index 62c3af95f952..41cfa99febbc 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/TargetLoweringBase.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/TargetLoweringBase.cpp
@@ -1023,20 +1023,25 @@ TargetLoweringBase::emitPatchPoint(MachineInstr &InitialMI,
// all stack slots), but we need to handle the
diff erent type of stackmap
// operands and memory effects here.
- // MI changes inside this loop as we grow operands.
- for(unsigned OperIdx = 0; OperIdx != MI->getNumOperands(); ++OperIdx) {
- MachineOperand &MO = MI->getOperand(OperIdx);
- if (!MO.isFI())
+ if (!llvm::any_of(MI->operands(),
+ [](MachineOperand &Operand) { return Operand.isFI(); }))
+ return MBB;
+
+ MachineInstrBuilder MIB = BuildMI(MF, MI->getDebugLoc(), MI->getDesc());
+
+ // Inherit previous memory operands.
+ MIB.cloneMemRefs(*MI);
+
+ for (auto &MO : MI->operands()) {
+ if (!MO.isFI()) {
+ MIB.add(MI->getOperand(OperIdx));
continue;
+ }
// foldMemoryOperand builds a new MI after replacing a single FI operand
// with the canonical set of five x86 addressing-mode operands.
int FI = MO.getIndex();
- MachineInstrBuilder MIB = BuildMI(MF, MI->getDebugLoc(), MI->getDesc());
- // Copy operands before the frame-index.
- for (unsigned i = 0; i < OperIdx; ++i)
- MIB.add(MI->getOperand(i));
// Add frame index operands recognized by stackmaps.cpp
if (MFI.isStatepointSpillSlotObjectIndex(FI)) {
// indirect-mem-ref tag, size, #FI, offset.
@@ -1055,12 +1060,7 @@ TargetLoweringBase::emitPatchPoint(MachineInstr &InitialMI,
MIB.add(MI->getOperand(OperIdx));
MIB.addImm(0);
}
- // Copy the operands after the frame index.
- for (unsigned i = OperIdx + 1; i != MI->getNumOperands(); ++i)
- MIB.add(MI->getOperand(i));
- // Inherit previous memory operands.
- MIB.cloneMemRefs(*MI);
assert(MIB->mayLoad() && "Folded a stackmap use to a non-load!");
// Add a new memory operand for this FI.
@@ -1075,13 +1075,9 @@ TargetLoweringBase::emitPatchPoint(MachineInstr &InitialMI,
MF.getDataLayout().getPointerSize(), MFI.getObjectAlign(FI));
MIB->addMemOperand(MF, MMO);
}
-
- // Replace the instruction and update the operand index.
- MBB->insert(MachineBasicBlock::iterator(MI), MIB);
- OperIdx += (MIB->getNumOperands() - MI->getNumOperands()) - 1;
- MI->eraseFromParent();
- MI = MIB;
}
+ MBB->insert(MachineBasicBlock::iterator(MI), MIB);
+ MI->eraseFromParent();
return MBB;
}
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list