[PATCH] D79936: [FileCheck] Add function call support to numerical expressions.

[Paul Walker via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

paulwalker-arm added a comment.

Prefix aside I'm just doing another rebase to bring in the signedness work. I'd like to know if it's going to be a requirement to support the reporting of overflow/underflow for the builtins in my patch.  Originally I had gone down the llvm route of making the operations signed rather than the data but I see the signedness patch implements the opposite.  Ultimately I need to know if there's light at the end of the tunnel or whether to give up and just write ugly tests.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D79936/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D79936