[llvm] 2d03898 - Revert "[LAA] We only need pointer checks if there are non-zero checks (NFC)."
Florian Hahn via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed May 27 04:48:29 PDT 2020
Author: Florian Hahn
Date: 2020-05-27T12:39:45+01:00
New Revision: 2d0389821e0c6371823198d3a5b1f032138a40bb
URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2d0389821e0c6371823198d3a5b1f032138a40bb
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2d0389821e0c6371823198d3a5b1f032138a40bb.diff
LOG: Revert "[LAA] We only need pointer checks if there are non-zero checks (NFC)."
This reverts commit 259abfc7cbc11cd98c05b1eb8e4b3fb6a9664bc0.
Reverting this, as I missed a case where we return without setting
RtCheck.Need.
Added:
Modified:
llvm/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp
llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp
Removed:
################################################################################
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp b/llvm/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp
index 6e1217f0476d..014cabd88fed 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp
@@ -701,14 +701,12 @@ bool AccessAnalysis::canCheckPtrAtRT(RuntimePointerChecking &RtCheck,
ScalarEvolution *SE, Loop *TheLoop,
const ValueToValueMap &StridesMap,
bool ShouldCheckWrap) {
- if (!IsRTCheckAnalysisNeeded)
- return true;
-
// Find pointers with computable bounds. We are going to use this information
// to place a runtime bound check.
bool CanDoRT = true;
- RtCheck.Need = false;
+ bool NeedRTCheck = false;
+ if (!IsRTCheckAnalysisNeeded) return true;
bool IsDepCheckNeeded = isDependencyCheckNeeded();
@@ -749,10 +747,10 @@ bool AccessAnalysis::canCheckPtrAtRT(RuntimePointerChecking &RtCheck,
// check them. But there is no need to checks if there is only one
// dependence set for this alias set.
//
- // Note that this function computes CanDoRT and RtCheck.Need independently.
- // For example CanDoRT=false, RtCheck.Need=false means that we have a
- // pointer for which we couldn't find the bounds but we don't actually need
- // to emit any checks so it does not matter.
+ // Note that this function computes CanDoRT and NeedRTCheck independently.
+ // For example CanDoRT=false, NeedRTCheck=false means that we have a pointer
+ // for which we couldn't find the bounds but we don't actually need to emit
+ // any checks so it does not matter.
bool NeedsAliasSetRTCheck = false;
if (!(IsDepCheckNeeded && CanDoAliasSetRT && RunningDepId == 2))
NeedsAliasSetRTCheck = (NumWritePtrChecks >= 2 ||
@@ -775,7 +773,7 @@ bool AccessAnalysis::canCheckPtrAtRT(RuntimePointerChecking &RtCheck,
}
CanDoRT &= CanDoAliasSetRT;
- RtCheck.Need |= NeedsAliasSetRTCheck;
+ NeedRTCheck |= NeedsAliasSetRTCheck;
++ASId;
}
@@ -809,19 +807,15 @@ bool AccessAnalysis::canCheckPtrAtRT(RuntimePointerChecking &RtCheck,
}
}
- if (RtCheck.Need && CanDoRT)
+ if (NeedRTCheck && CanDoRT)
RtCheck.generateChecks(DepCands, IsDepCheckNeeded);
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: We need to do " << RtCheck.getNumberOfChecks()
<< " pointer comparisons.\n");
- // If we can do run-time checks, but there are no checks, no runtime checks
- // are needed. This can happen when all pointers point to the same underlying
- // object for example.
- if (CanDoRT)
- RtCheck.Need = RtCheck.getNumberOfChecks() != 0;
+ RtCheck.Need = NeedRTCheck;
- bool CanDoRTIfNeeded = !RtCheck.Need || CanDoRT;
+ bool CanDoRTIfNeeded = !NeedRTCheck || CanDoRT;
if (!CanDoRTIfNeeded)
RtCheck.reset();
return CanDoRTIfNeeded;
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp
index 8d52ddc5b3b5..df1529a2f7b9 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp
@@ -2795,8 +2795,8 @@ void InnerLoopVectorizer::emitMemRuntimeChecks(Loop *L, BasicBlock *Bypass) {
std::tie(FirstCheckInst, MemRuntimeCheck) =
addRuntimeChecks(MemCheckBlock->getTerminator(), OrigLoop,
RtPtrChecking.getChecks(), RtPtrChecking.getSE());
- assert(MemRuntimeCheck && "no RT checks generated although RtPtrChecking "
- "claimed checks are required");
+ if (!MemRuntimeCheck)
+ return;
if (MemCheckBlock->getParent()->hasOptSize()) {
assert(Cost->Hints->getForce() == LoopVectorizeHints::FK_Enabled &&
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list