[PATCH] D78107: [CSInfo][MIPS] Call delay slot support in DwarfDebug
Djordje Todorovic via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri May 8 06:56:40 PDT 2020
djtodoro added inline comments.
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfDebug.cpp:859-860
+ // TODO: Add support for targets with delay slots (see: beginInstruction).
+ if (TT.isMIPS())
+ return true;
+ return false;
----------------
vsk wrote:
> dstenb wrote:
> > Do you know what would happen if you didn't have this guard, and enabled call site information for another target with delay slots?
> >
> > If it is something that is relatively easy to catch, or perhaps not very serious, I think I'd prefer to have this code target-agnostic (i.e. just `MI.hasDelaySlot`), and just leave it up to the developer enabling call site information for the target to make sure that there are no delay slot quirks that need to be considered.
> + 1
+1, but I think we should at least make an assertion describing what we currently expect, e.g. bundled call instruction should be mips-call-bundle like:
call {
delay slot
}
label
================
Comment at: llvm/test/DebugInfo/MIR/Mips/dbg-call-site-delay-slot-interpretation-64bit.mir:93
+ !20 = !DILocation(line: 0, scope: !13)
+ !21 = !DILocation(line: 3, column: 7, scope: !13)
+ !22 = !DILocation(line: 4, column: 17, scope: !13)
----------------
Please use only one `DILocation` per scope.
e.g. attach every {!21, !22, !23, !24} dbg! to !21
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D78107/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D78107
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list