[PATCH] D78997: [SLP] add another bailout for load-combine patterns

Alexey Bataev via Phabricator via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue May 5 07:31:06 PDT 2020

Previous message: [PATCH] D78997: [SLP] add another bailout for load-combine patterns
Next message: [PATCH] D78997: [SLP] add another bailout for load-combine patterns
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

ABataev added a comment.

May it happen at all that on some platforms it might be profitable to vectorize such sequences rather than use scalarized code? If so, better to implement cost analysis.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D78997/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D78997

Previous message: [PATCH] D78997: [SLP] add another bailout for load-combine patterns
Next message: [PATCH] D78997: [SLP] add another bailout for load-combine patterns
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the llvm-commits mailing list