[PATCH] D78505: [MLIR] Fix affine loop tiling utility upper bound bug
Uday Bondhugula via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Apr 20 12:28:12 PDT 2020
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rG3dff8c9109a7: [MLIR] Fix affine loop tiling utility upper bound bug (authored by bondhugula).
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D78505/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D78505
Files:
mlir/lib/Dialect/Affine/Transforms/LoopTiling.cpp
mlir/test/Dialect/Affine/loop-tiling.mlir
Index: mlir/test/Dialect/Affine/loop-tiling.mlir
===================================================================
--- mlir/test/Dialect/Affine/loop-tiling.mlir
+++ mlir/test/Dialect/Affine/loop-tiling.mlir
@@ -6,15 +6,16 @@
// CHECK-DAG: [[MAP0:#map[0-9]+]] = affine_map<(d0) -> (d0 + 32)>
// CHECK-DAG: [[MAP1:#map[0-9]+]] = affine_map<(d0) -> (d0 + 32, 50)>
-// CHECK-DAG: [[IDENTITY:#map[0-9]+]] = affine_map<(d0) -> (d0)>
+// CHECK-DAG: [[ID:#map[0-9]+]] = affine_map<(d0) -> (d0)>
+// CHECK-DAG: [[ID_PLUS_21:#map[0-9]+]] = affine_map<(d0) -> (d0 + 21)>
// CHECK-LABEL: func @loop_tiling()
// CHECK-NEXT: affine.for %{{.*}} = 0 to 256 step 32 {
// CHECK-NEXT: affine.for %{{.*}} = 0 to 512 step 32 {
// CHECK-NEXT: affine.for %{{.*}} = 0 to 1024 step 32 {
-// CHECK-NEXT: affine.for %{{.*}} = [[IDENTITY]](%{{.*}}) to [[MAP0]](%{{.*}}) {
-// CHECK-NEXT: affine.for %{{.*}} = [[IDENTITY]](%{{.*}}) to [[MAP0]](%{{.*}}) {
-// CHECK-NEXT: affine.for %{{.*}} = [[IDENTITY]](%{{.*}}) to [[MAP0]](%{{.*}}) {
+// CHECK-NEXT: affine.for %{{.*}} = [[ID]](%{{.*}}) to [[MAP0]](%{{.*}}) {
+// CHECK-NEXT: affine.for %{{.*}} = [[ID]](%{{.*}}) to [[MAP0]](%{{.*}}) {
+// CHECK-NEXT: affine.for %{{.*}} = [[ID]](%{{.*}}) to [[MAP0]](%{{.*}}) {
// CHECK-NEXT: "foo"(%{{.*}}, %{{.*}}, %{{.*}}) : (index, index, index) -> ()
// CHECK-NEXT: }
// CHECK-NEXT: }
@@ -23,12 +24,12 @@
// CHECK-NEXT: }
// CHECK-NEXT: }
// CHECK-NEXT: affine.for %{{.*}} = 0 to 50 step 32 {
-// CHECK-NEXT: affine.for %{{.*}} = [[IDENTITY]](%{{.*}}) to min [[MAP1]](%{{.*}}) {
+// CHECK-NEXT: affine.for %{{.*}} = [[ID]](%{{.*}}) to min [[MAP1]](%{{.*}}) {
// CHECK-NEXT: "bar"(%{{.*}}, %{{.*}}) : (index, index) -> ()
// CHECK-NEXT: }
// CHECK-NEXT: }
-// CHECK-NEXT: affine.for %{{.*}} = 0 to 21 step 32 {
-// CHECK-NEXT: affine.for %{{.*}} = [[IDENTITY]](%{{.*}}) to 21 {
+// CHECK-NEXT: affine.for %[[I:.*]] = 0 to 21 step 32 {
+// CHECK-NEXT: affine.for %{{.*}} = [[ID]](%[[I]]) to [[ID_PLUS_21]](%[[I]]) {
// CHECK-NEXT: "foobar"(%{{.*}}) : (index) -> ()
// CHECK-NEXT: }
// CHECK-NEXT: }
@@ -170,6 +171,27 @@
// -----
+func @tile_size_larger_than_trip_count_symbolic_bound(%M: index, %N : index) {
+ affine.for %i = affine_map<(d0) -> (d0)>(%M) to affine_map<(d0) -> (d0 + 2)>(%M) {
+ affine.for %j = affine_map<(d0) -> (d0)>(%N) to affine_map<(d0) -> (d0 + 4)>(%N) {
+ "test.foo" () : () -> ()
+ }
+ }
+ return
+}
+
+// CHECK-DAG: #[[ID:.*]] = affine_map<(d0) -> (d0)>
+// CHECK-DAG: #[[ID_PLUS_2:.*]] = affine_map<(d0) -> (d0 + 2)>
+// CHECK-DAG: #[[ID_PLUS_4:.*]] = affine_map<(d0) -> (d0 + 4)>
+// CHECK: %[[M:.*]]: index, %[[N:.*]]: index
+// CHECK: affine.for %[[I:.*]] = #[[ID]](%[[M]]) to #[[ID_PLUS_2]](%[[M]]) step 32
+// CHECK-NEXT: affine.for %[[J:.*]] = #[[ID]](%[[N]]) to #[[ID_PLUS_4]](%[[N]]) step 32
+// CHECK-NEXT: affine.for %arg4 = #[[ID]](%[[I]]) to #[[ID_PLUS_2]](%[[I]])
+// CHECK-NEXT: affine.for %arg5 = #[[ID]](%[[J]]) to #[[ID_PLUS_4]](%[[J]])
+// CHECK-NEXT: "test.foo"
+
+// -----
+
// CHECK-LABEL: func @trip_count_1
// SEPARATE-LABEL: func @trip_count_1
func @trip_count_1(%arg0: memref<196608x1xf32>, %arg1: memref<196608x1xf32>)
Index: mlir/lib/Dialect/Affine/Transforms/LoopTiling.cpp
===================================================================
--- mlir/lib/Dialect/Affine/Transforms/LoopTiling.cpp
+++ mlir/lib/Dialect/Affine/Transforms/LoopTiling.cpp
@@ -110,9 +110,11 @@
// Set the upper bound.
if (mayBeConstantCount && mayBeConstantCount.getValue() < tileSizes[i]) {
- // Trip count is less than tile size; upper bound is the trip count.
- auto ubMap = b.getConstantAffineMap(mayBeConstantCount.getValue());
- newLoops[width + i].setUpperBoundMap(ubMap);
+ // Trip count is less than the tile size: upper bound is lower bound +
+ // trip count.
+ auto ubMap = b.getSingleDimShiftAffineMap(mayBeConstantCount.getValue());
+ newLoops[width + i].setUpperBound(
+ /*operands=*/newLoops[i].getInductionVar(), ubMap);
} else if (largestDiv % tileSizes[i] != 0) {
// Intra-tile loop ii goes from i to min(i + tileSize, ub_i).
// Construct the upper bound map; the operands are the original operands
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D78505.258815.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 4409 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20200420/44a8dbfb/attachment.bin>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list