[PATCH] D76715: [mlir] Clarify constraint on derived attribute
River Riddle via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Mar 24 11:49:17 PDT 2020
rriddle accepted this revision.
rriddle added inline comments.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
================
Comment at: mlir/docs/OpDefinitions.md:183
+ All derived attributes should be materializable as an Attribute. That is,
+ even though they are not materialized, it should be possible to store as
----------------
Why is this indented?
================
Comment at: mlir/include/mlir/IR/OpBase.td:1390
+// Note: All derived attributes should be materializable as an Attribute. E.g.,
+// do not used DerivedAttr for things that could not have been stored as
+// Attribute.
----------------
typo: used
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D76715/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D76715
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list