Transfer ownership of the XCore backend

Nigel Perks via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Mar 23 10:12:12 PDT 2020


OK, thanks. Yes, we certainly want to be actively involved, fixing bugs, adapting to new APIs, and so on.

Nigel

From: Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com>
Sent: 23 March 2020 16:56
To: Nigel Perks <nigelp at xmos.com>; llvm-commits ML <llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org>
Subject: Re: Transfer ownership of the XCore backend


I'll point out that getting commit access is as easy as emailing Chris.  :)

I would encourage you to post patches, but that can happen in either order w.r.t. the code owner change as far as I'm concerned.  Just be prepared to follow through and be actively involved.

Philip
On 3/23/20 9:18 AM, Nigel Perks wrote:
Thanks for the feedback, Philip. I will make some patches to the existing backend before proposing code owner change.

Nigel

From: Nigel Perks
Sent: 23 March 2020 16:04
To: Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com><mailto:listmail at philipreames.com>; llvm-commits ML <llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org><mailto:llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org>
Cc: Chris Lattner <clattner at nondot.org><mailto:clattner at nondot.org>
Subject: RE: Transfer ownership of the XCore backend

Thanks for the quick reply. I am happy to do what the community thinks best. The current named code owner has left XMOS, where the backend was written for the XMOS chip. We want to merge the current upstream backend with our shipping version, and then maintain it upstream. But it's true I have no record of code patches yet.

Nigel


From: Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com<mailto:listmail at philipreames.com>>
Sent: 23 March 2020 15:59
To: Nigel Perks <nigelp at xmos.com<mailto:nigelp at xmos.com>>; llvm-commits ML <llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org>>
Cc: Chris Lattner <clattner at nondot.org<mailto:clattner at nondot.org>>
Subject: Re: Transfer ownership of the XCore backend


It seems very strange to be listing someone in code owners without commit access?

Philip
On 3/23/20 7:57 AM, Nigel Perks via llvm-commits wrote:
Not a code patch, just to update CODE_OWNERS.

I have tried to follow the instructions in Developer Policy and Contributing, but please tell me if I should do anything differently.

I do not have commit access, so please can this be committed if it is satisfactory.

I have cc'd Chris Lattner for review, as we agreed the change on llvm-dev. Again please tell me if this is not right.

Many thanks,

Nigel Perks
XMOS



_______________________________________________

llvm-commits mailing list

llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org>

https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20200323/62679467/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list