[PATCH] D75120: [ValueLattice] Add new state for undef constants.
Eli Friedman via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Mar 11 13:02:08 PDT 2020
efriedma added inline comments.
================
Comment at: llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/ValueLattice.h:137
+ if (isa<UndefValue>(C))
+ Res.markUndefined();
+ else
----------------
fhahn wrote:
> efriedma wrote:
> > I'm not sure I understand how getNot(undef) is supposed to work.
> I think it should be fine to assume `x != undef => undef`. Alive seems to agree. Granted, it is probably not very useful. I tried to replace it with an assert ruling out undef here, but we hit this case in practice in LVI via JumpThreading.
If you prove x != undef, x can't be any specific value... including undef, I think. So actually you could just treat it as unknown, I think?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D75120/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D75120
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list