[PATCH] D75831: [mlir][Linalg] Revisit 0-D abstraction
Nicolas Vasilache via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Mar 10 06:58:53 PDT 2020
nicolasvasilache added a comment.
> This seems to have an affine_map for scalars being () -> (). This seems odd. Isn't it better to have a scalar access be (i,j) -> (), or something like that.
Whatever we do for 0-D is a convention, we can chose the convention we want.
`()->()` did not require parser changes whereas `(i, j) -> ()` does.
I went ahead and implemented those changes.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D75831/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D75831
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list