[PATCH] D71888: [mlir] Added llvm.resume and personality functions in LLVM IR Dialect
River Riddle via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Feb 17 19:33:01 PST 2020
rriddle added inline comments.
================
Comment at: mlir/lib/Target/LLVMIR/ModuleTranslation.cpp:637
+ for (Value v : values) {
+ assert(valueMapping.find(v) != valueMapping.end() &&
+ "referencing undefined value");
----------------
mehdi_amini wrote:
> shraiysh wrote:
> > bondhugula wrote:
> > > shraiysh wrote:
> > > > rriddle wrote:
> > > > > nit: llvm::is_contained
> > > > I think `llvm::is_contained` is a wrapper for `std::find`. I am not sure if there is a neat way of looking for keys in a map using `std::find` (and hence `llvm::is_contained`). Please let me know if there is.
> > > It might be a wrapper around it, but it's more readable to me with llvm::is_contained.
> > I meant `llvm::is_contained(valueMapping, v)` does not work - because `valueMapping` is a `DenseMap`. I am not aware of a variant of `is_contained` that supports maps - looking for a key in it. Currently I am using `std::map::find` while the documentation suggests `is_contained` is wrapper for `std::find`.
> rather `valueMapping.count(v)` ?
Gah, I was hoping that llvm::is_contained would be smart enough to detect find at this point. Given that, you should use .count() instead.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D71888/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D71888
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list