[llvm] baf3a53 - [docs] Minor updates to DeveloperPolicy due to svn to git

[Jinsong Ji via llvm-commits]

Author: Jinsong Ji
Date: 2020-02-12T21:08:15Z
New Revision: baf3a53b5750a0b1363248d45b0fa0cbda0253e1

URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/baf3a53b5750a0b1363248d45b0fa0cbda0253e1
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/baf3a53b5750a0b1363248d45b0fa0cbda0253e1.diff

LOG: [docs] Minor updates to DeveloperPolicy due to svn to git

Reviewed By: efriedma

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73971

Added: 
    

Modified: 
    llvm/docs/DeveloperPolicy.rst

Removed: 
    


################################################################################
diff  --git a/llvm/docs/DeveloperPolicy.rst b/llvm/docs/DeveloperPolicy.rst
index c4d0ceb73c8e..883556fc9536 100644
--- a/llvm/docs/DeveloperPolicy.rst
+++ b/llvm/docs/DeveloperPolicy.rst
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ larger features. Accepted ways to speed up review times for your patches are:
 Developers should participate in code reviews as both reviewers and
 reviewees. If someone is kind enough to review your code, you should return the
 favor for someone else.  Note that anyone is welcome to review and give feedback
-on a patch, but only people with Subversion write access can approve it.
+on a patch, but only people with GitHub commit access can approve it.
 
 There is a web based code review tool that can optionally be used
 for code reviews. See :doc:`Phabricator`.
@@ -325,9 +325,9 @@ Below are some guidelines about the format of the message itself:
   and in-code comments, ex. capitalization, full stop, etc.
 
 * If the commit is a bug fix on top of another recently committed patch, or a
-  revert or reapply of a patch, include the svn revision number of the prior
-  related commit. This could be as simple as "Revert rNNNN because it caused
-  PR#".
+  revert or reapply of a patch, include the git commit hash of the prior
+  related commit. This could be as simple as "Revert commit NNNN because it
+  caused PR#".
 
 For minor violations of these recommendations, the community normally favors
 reminding the contributor of this policy over reverting. Minor corrections and