[llvm] e195ff9 - Recommit "[X86] Use X86ISD::SUB instead of X86ISD::CMP in some places."
Craig Topper via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Feb 4 12:19:51 PST 2020
Author: Craig Topper
Date: 2020-02-04T12:19:34-08:00
New Revision: e195ff98f6cc2f868d5f8c19d2ab93cfb3a2cb65
URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e195ff98f6cc2f868d5f8c19d2ab93cfb3a2cb65
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e195ff98f6cc2f868d5f8c19d2ab93cfb3a2cb65.diff
LOG: Recommit "[X86] Use X86ISD::SUB instead of X86ISD::CMP in some places."
This time with correct types for the data result from the SUB.
Original commit message:
Our normal lowering for ISD::SETCC uses X86ISD::SUB to enable
CSE unless the RHS is 0. optimizeCompareInstr called by the peephole
pass can turn subs with unused results into cmps to clean this up.
This commit makes other places that create X86ISD::CMP have the
same behavior.
Added:
Modified:
llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
Removed:
################################################################################
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
index 6e408d73d3aa..58d797c95559 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
@@ -22231,25 +22231,26 @@ SDValue X86TargetLowering::LowerSELECT(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const {
SDValue Y = isAllOnesConstant(Op2) ? Op1 : Op2;
SDValue CmpOp0 = Cmp.getOperand(0);
+ SDVTList VTs = DAG.getVTList(Op.getValueType(), MVT::i32);
+ SDVTList CmpVTs = DAG.getVTList(CmpOp0.getValueType(), MVT::i32);
+
// Apply further optimizations for special cases
// (select (x != 0), -1, 0) -> neg & sbb
// (select (x == 0), 0, -1) -> neg & sbb
if (isNullConstant(Y) &&
(isAllOnesConstant(Op1) == (CondCode == X86::COND_NE))) {
SDValue Zero = DAG.getConstant(0, DL, CmpOp0.getValueType());
- SDValue CmpZero = DAG.getNode(X86ISD::CMP, DL, MVT::i32, Zero, CmpOp0);
- SDVTList VTs = DAG.getVTList(Op.getValueType(), MVT::i32);
+ SDValue Neg = DAG.getNode(X86ISD::SUB, DL, CmpVTs, Zero, CmpOp0);
Zero = DAG.getConstant(0, DL, Op.getValueType());
- return DAG.getNode(X86ISD::SBB, DL, VTs, Zero, Zero, CmpZero);
+ return DAG.getNode(X86ISD::SBB, DL, VTs, Zero, Zero, Neg.getValue(1));
}
- Cmp = DAG.getNode(X86ISD::CMP, DL, MVT::i32,
+ Cmp = DAG.getNode(X86ISD::SUB, DL, CmpVTs,
CmpOp0, DAG.getConstant(1, DL, CmpOp0.getValueType()));
- SDVTList VTs = DAG.getVTList(Op.getValueType(), MVT::i32);
SDValue Zero = DAG.getConstant(0, DL, Op.getValueType());
SDValue Res = // Res = 0 or -1.
- DAG.getNode(X86ISD::SBB, DL, VTs, Zero, Zero, Cmp);
+ DAG.getNode(X86ISD::SBB, DL, VTs, Zero, Zero, Cmp.getValue(1));
if (isAllOnesConstant(Op1) != (CondCode == X86::COND_E))
Res = DAG.getNOT(DL, Res, Res.getValueType());
@@ -44981,15 +44982,18 @@ static SDValue combineAddOrSubToADCOrSBB(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG) {
if ((IsSub && CC == X86::COND_E && ConstantX->isNullValue()) ||
(!IsSub && CC == X86::COND_NE && ConstantX->isAllOnesValue())) {
SDValue One = DAG.getConstant(1, DL, ZVT);
- SDValue Cmp1 = DAG.getNode(X86ISD::CMP, DL, MVT::i32, Z, One);
+ SDVTList X86SubVTs = DAG.getVTList(ZVT, MVT::i32);
+ SDValue Cmp1 = DAG.getNode(X86ISD::SUB, DL, X86SubVTs, Z, One);
return DAG.getNode(X86ISD::SETCC_CARRY, DL, VT,
- DAG.getTargetConstant(X86::COND_B, DL, MVT::i8), Cmp1);
+ DAG.getTargetConstant(X86::COND_B, DL, MVT::i8),
+ Cmp1.getValue(1));
}
}
// (cmp Z, 1) sets the carry flag if Z is 0.
SDValue One = DAG.getConstant(1, DL, ZVT);
- SDValue Cmp1 = DAG.getNode(X86ISD::CMP, DL, MVT::i32, Z, One);
+ SDVTList X86SubVTs = DAG.getVTList(ZVT, MVT::i32);
+ SDValue Cmp1 = DAG.getNode(X86ISD::SUB, DL, X86SubVTs, Z, One);
// Add the flags type for ADC/SBB nodes.
SDVTList VTs = DAG.getVTList(VT, MVT::i32);
@@ -44998,12 +45002,12 @@ static SDValue combineAddOrSubToADCOrSBB(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG) {
// X + (Z != 0) --> add X, (zext(setne Z, 0)) --> sbb X, -1, (cmp Z, 1)
if (CC == X86::COND_NE)
return DAG.getNode(IsSub ? X86ISD::ADC : X86ISD::SBB, DL, VTs, X,
- DAG.getConstant(-1ULL, DL, VT), Cmp1);
+ DAG.getConstant(-1ULL, DL, VT), Cmp1.getValue(1));
// X - (Z == 0) --> sub X, (zext(sete Z, 0)) --> sbb X, 0, (cmp Z, 1)
// X + (Z == 0) --> add X, (zext(sete Z, 0)) --> adc X, 0, (cmp Z, 1)
return DAG.getNode(IsSub ? X86ISD::SBB : X86ISD::ADC, DL, VTs, X,
- DAG.getConstant(0, DL, VT), Cmp1);
+ DAG.getConstant(0, DL, VT), Cmp1.getValue(1));
}
static SDValue combineLoopMAddPattern(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG,
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list