[PATCH] D72665: [X86] Break the loop in LowerReturn into 2 loops.
Pengfei Wang via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jan 13 18:41:44 PST 2020
pengfei added a comment.
Do we really need to distinguish `STRICT_FP_EXTEND` and `FP_EXTEND` for a return? Currently the `STRICT` nodes are used to avoid to be optimized out or reordered. But I think neither occurs for a return.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D72665/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D72665
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list