[PATCH] D72575: [x86] try harder to form 256-bit unpck*
Simon Pilgrim via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jan 13 08:31:58 PST 2020
RKSimon added inline comments.
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp:16190
if (V2.isUndef()) {
+ if (SDValue V = lowerShuffleWithUNPCK256(DL, MVT::v8i32, Mask, V1, V2, DAG))
+ return V;
----------------
Add a comment and move the VPERMD comment.
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp:16251
+ if (SDValue V = lowerShuffleWithUNPCK256(DL, MVT::v16i16, Mask, V1, V2, DAG))
+ return V;
+
----------------
Add a comment.
This generates a shuffle sequence, its probably better to place this after all the lowerShuffle* calls that create single (non-variable) instructions.
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp:16354
+ if (SDValue V = lowerShuffleWithUNPCK256(DL, MVT::v32i8, Mask, V1, V2, DAG))
+ return V;
+
----------------
Add a comment.
This generates a shuffle sequence, its probably better to place this after all the lowerShuffle* calls that create single (non-variable) instructions.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D72575/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D72575
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list