[PATCH] D72006: [MLIR] Added llvm.invoke and llvm.landingpad

Alex Zinenko via Phabricator via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Dec 31 01:31:00 PST 2019


ftynse added a comment.

> For 2. I would remove the attributes and just do the same thing that LLVM does, i.e. if the type is an Array it is a filter. I don't see a reason why attributes are necessary on top of that.

Does anything preclude catch type from being an array type, in theory? (In C++, it's a pointer to a `std::type_info`, but we should not be limited to that)


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D72006/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D72006





More information about the llvm-commits mailing list