[PATCH] D71930: [mlir][spirv] Add basic definitions for supporting availability
Mahesh Ravishankar via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Dec 27 11:58:27 PST 2019
mravishankar requested changes to this revision.
mravishankar added a comment.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
The SPIR-V part looks fine to me. I have no major comments on the tblgen part. Maybe get some one with more knowledge to review it.
================
Comment at: mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/SPIRV/SPIRVBase.td:49
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+// Op availability definitions
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
----------------
I am assuming these will move into a different file some time. Can we put them in a different td file for separation?
================
Comment at: mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/SPIRV/SPIRVBase.td:165
+ extensions for the implementing SPIR-V operation. The returned value
+ is a neted vector whose element is `mlir::spirv::Extension`s. The outer
+ vector's elements (which are vectors) should be interpreted as conjunction
----------------
nit : neted -> nested
================
Comment at: mlir/test/Dialect/SPIRV/TestAvailability.cpp:19
+struct TestAvailability : public FunctionPass<TestAvailability> {
+ void runOnFunction() override;
+};
----------------
Should this be a module pass? Do we need to look at ops at "module-level" to arrive at capabilities?
================
Comment at: mlir/tools/mlir-tblgen/SPIRVUtilsGen.cpp:1
//===- SPIRVSerializationGen.cpp - SPIR-V serialization utility generator -===//
//
----------------
Is there a reason to not have them in a separate file. The additions are completely independent here right?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D71930/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D71930
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list