[PATCH] D71367: [AMDGPU] Fold 64 bit immediates
Matt Arsenault via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sat Dec 21 02:33:34 PST 2019
arsenm added inline comments.
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIInstrInfo.cpp:2954-2958
+ if (MO.isImm()) {
+ int64_t Imm = MO.getImm();
+ if (!isInt<32>(Imm) && !isUInt<32>(Imm))
+ return false;
+ }
----------------
rampitec wrote:
> arsenm wrote:
> > I think this is more complicated and depends on the context instruction, which is why this was never done. I think some instructions zero-extend the 32-bit constants (including FP), and then maybe some sign extend
> Do you have an example? As far as I understand HW logic is quite primitive and doesn't distinguish, so it is always sign extended. At least this has passed PSDB and was used specifically in the fp context.
You would have to craft new execution tests for FP constants. It's unlikely anything is really testing FP constants that would stress this
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D71367/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D71367
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list