[PATCH] D70447: [Support] ThreadPoolExecutor fixes for Windows/MinGW

[River Riddle via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

rriddle added a comment.

FWIW I've been using parallel::for_each in a few places in MLIR to do multi-threading, because it seemed like the right solution for what I needed. From what I gather here it seems like I should switch all of those usages to ThreadPool instead. If we can't resolve the deficiencies present in the current implementation it would be nice to move it out of Support/ so that others don't make the same mistake.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D70447/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D70447