[PATCH] D71128: [NVPTX][FIX] Expand atomics we cannot handle natively in the ISA
Matt Arsenault via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Dec 10 08:24:49 PST 2019
arsenm added inline comments.
================
Comment at: llvm/test/Transforms/AtomicExpand/NVPTX/expand-atomic-rmw-fsub.ll:15
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP4:%.*]] = bitcast float [[LOADED]] to i32
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP5:%.*]] = cmpxchg i32* [[TMP2]], i32 [[TMP4]], i32 [[TMP3]] seq_cst seq_cst
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[SUCCESS:%.*]] = extractvalue { i32, i1 } [[TMP5]], 1
----------------
jdoerfert wrote:
> tra wrote:
> > I must be missing something -- I would think that we do *not* want to expand atomicrmw variants which we can lower to an existing instruction, but a lot of the tests show the opposite and expand atomics that have direct support in hardware. The patch subject seems to agree with my assumptions, but the tests appear to contradict it. Is that intentional? If so, what is it that I'm missing?
> It is not intentional to pesimise anything, as mentioned above. The problem is I am neither a backend nor NVPTX person and my changes do seem to have unwanted effects I cannot even categorize.
For the purpose of this change, that this isn't optimal doesn't matter. These aren't implemented correct, but doing so is a separate change and those changes will show up in the same tests here
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D71128/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D71128
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list