[PATCH] D68800: [LNT] Python 3 support: adapt csv reader open
Thomas Preud'homme via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Dec 5 08:28:11 PST 2019
thopre marked an inline comment as done.
thopre added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lnt/tests/nt.py:774-777
+ if sys.version_info[0] < 3:
+ report_file = open(report_path, 'rb')
+ else:
+ report_file = open(report_path, 'r', newline='')
----------------
PrzemekWirkus wrote:
> PrzemekWirkus wrote:
> > PrzemekWirkus wrote:
> > > PrzemekWirkus wrote:
> > > > PrzemekWirkus wrote:
> > > > > Can you verify that you should rather use mode == 'U' for universal mode?
> > > > >
> > > > > https://docs.python.org/release/3.2/library/functions.html#open
> > > > >
> > > > > See table below the Python 3 open function instead of newline == ''.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm not an expert in this area.
> > > > I need to clarify:
> > > >
> > > > I was wondering if we should combine mode == 'rU' with newline=='' or not.
> > > My thinking is that when you use Universal mode "rU" you will get all newlines -> '\n'. Would that be enough you think?
> > ```
> > report_file = open(report_path, 'ru')
> > ```
> >
> > Should be enough I guess. Are you able to verify this on your end ?
> s/u/U/
>
> ```
> report_file = open(report_path, 'rU')
> ```
It works on my testing but I'm not too keen on using rU since the doc you linked says specifically it's for compatibility and should not be used in new code. My goal in this Python 3 conversion is to follow the Python 3 codestyle/idioms.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68800/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68800
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list