[PATCH] D70487: Summary:[DAGCombiner] Allow zextended load combines.
Dave Green via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Nov 20 11:47:00 PST 2019
dmgreen added inline comments.
================
Comment at: llvm/test/CodeGen/ARM/load-combine-big-endian.ll:637
+; CHECK-NEXT: lsl r0, r0, #16
+; CHECK-NEXT: orr r0, r1, r0, lsr #24
; CHECK-NEXT: mov pc, lr
----------------
courbet wrote:
> RKSimon wrote:
> > regression
> Yes, that's something I meant to highlight in thsi patch, but forgot to send the comment:
>
> I've seen in other tests for ARM we're OK paying quite a large number of instructions to avoid loads, e.g.
>
> ```
> define i32 @load_i32_by_i8_bswap(i32* %arg) {
> ; BSWAP is not supported by 32 bit target
> ; CHECK-LABEL: load_i32_by_i8_bswap:
> ; CHECK: @ %bb.0:
> ; CHECK-NEXT: ldr r0, [r0]
> ; CHECK-NEXT: mov r1, #65280
> ; CHECK-NEXT: mov r2, #16711680
> ; CHECK-NEXT: and r1, r1, r0, lsr #8
> ; CHECK-NEXT: and r2, r2, r0, lsl #8
> ; CHECK-NEXT: orr r1, r1, r0, lsr #24
> ; CHECK-NEXT: orr r0, r2, r0, lsl #24
> ; CHECK-NEXT: orr r0, r0, r1
> ; CHECK-NEXT: mov pc, lr
> ```
>
> I'm not very familiar with these targets, where do we draw the line ?
This appears to be running under a very old architecture where bswap is not legal.
Any idea why it is trying to perform this optimisation when there is no bswap to make it efficient?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D70487/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D70487
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list