[PATCH] D70487: Summary:[DAGCombiner] Allow zextended load combines.

Dave Green via Phabricator via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Nov 20 11:47:00 PST 2019


dmgreen added inline comments.


================
Comment at: llvm/test/CodeGen/ARM/load-combine-big-endian.ll:637
+; CHECK-NEXT:    lsl r0, r0, #16
+; CHECK-NEXT:    orr r0, r1, r0, lsr #24
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    mov pc, lr
----------------
courbet wrote:
> RKSimon wrote:
> > regression
> Yes, that's something I meant to highlight in thsi patch, but forgot to send the comment:
> 
> I've seen in other tests for ARM we're OK paying quite a large number of instructions to avoid loads, e.g.
> 
> ```
> define i32 @load_i32_by_i8_bswap(i32* %arg) {
> ; BSWAP is not supported by 32 bit target
> ; CHECK-LABEL: load_i32_by_i8_bswap:
> ; CHECK:       @ %bb.0:
> ; CHECK-NEXT:    ldr r0, [r0]
> ; CHECK-NEXT:    mov r1, #65280
> ; CHECK-NEXT:    mov r2, #16711680
> ; CHECK-NEXT:    and r1, r1, r0, lsr #8
> ; CHECK-NEXT:    and r2, r2, r0, lsl #8
> ; CHECK-NEXT:    orr r1, r1, r0, lsr #24
> ; CHECK-NEXT:    orr r0, r2, r0, lsl #24
> ; CHECK-NEXT:    orr r0, r0, r1
> ; CHECK-NEXT:    mov pc, lr
> ```
> 
> I'm not very familiar with these targets, where do we draw the line ?
This appears to be running under a very old architecture where bswap is not legal.

Any idea why it is trying to perform this optimisation when there is no bswap to make it efficient?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D70487/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D70487





More information about the llvm-commits mailing list